for diverse, democratic and accountable media
BBC - getting its capitulation in first
news |
be the first to comment
'BBC falls on Tories' sword' is the lead story in the current issue of Free Press. It outlines just what the deal, meekly accepted by the corporation, actually means for the so called 'independence' of the BBC and the implications for programming and jobs. It is clear that in the run up to the renewal of the BBC's charter in 2016 (during which TV digital switchover will be completed) there will be great battles over cuts backs and unless a vigorous fight back takes place and public awareness is raised, the prospects of a even weaker BBCare likely - good news for the Murdoch media empire. The very future of public service broadcasting is at stake
In addition the following letter from Professor Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications and Professor Jean Seaton, Professor of Media History at the University of Westminster, was sent to the Financial Times following the announcement of the government and BBC settlement. When combined with the 20% job cuts in Ofcom recently announced, conspiracy theorists might look back to the James Murdock MacTaggart lecture last year for a preview of what was to come.
'The government's imposition of a licence fee settlement which amounts to a 16% cut in the BBC's income raises a fundamental question about the BBC's independence from government. While BBC negotiations with incumbent governments have always involved robust diplomacy, they have historically taken place over several months and with due respect by government negotiators for the BBC's separateness from government departments as well as its cultural and democratic importance.
The brutal arm-twisting which this week appears to have taken place over a period of three days, using government cuts as an excuse for transferring a raft of departmental spending to the BBC while freezing the licence fee, has demonstrated a contempt for the principle of BBC independence which is unprecedented. The notion that the BBC should “suffer" the same pain as government departments is itself revealing evidence of the government's determination to treat it as an arm of its own fiscal policy. The BBC belongs to the licence payers. Who asked them if they agreed? Do they approve of the reduced investment in television and radio programmes that must inevitably follow?
The BBC Trust was established to stand up for the licence payers, but was clearly compromised in what should have been a constitutional duty to consult licence payers before responding to government. That it did not do so is both a testament to the government's successful intimidatory tactics, and to inadequate mechanisms to protect the interests of licence payers. Now that the Trust is to stay, it must re-establish itself as a constitutional safeguard for the public interest as well as ensuring that the newly transferred World Service is protected from direct Foreign Office intervention. In the absence of any such protections, this week's events could well mark the moment that the balance of power between government and the BBC shifted irreversibly. The rest of the world will be watching with interest.'
Prof Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications Prof Jean Seaton, Professor of Media History, University of Westminster, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3TP.
Send your views on the BBC settlement and what it could mean for the future of public service broadcasting, to our web site. In addition please support the campaign launched by 38 Degrees against the BBC cuts. Go to: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/speakout/protect-BBC for more details.
DATELINE: 10 December, 2010
Share